Community sponsorsBecome a sponsor ↗
Education

Hillsborough School Board Puts Off Decision on Banning Political Activity at Schools

Board members proposed barring partisan activity on campus and requiring email notice before elected officials visit, but First Amendment concerns pushed any vote to next spring.

·3 min read·
Hillsborough School Board Puts Off Decision on Banning Political Activity at Schools
React
Join the conversation

Hillsborough County School Board members spent part of Tuesday's meeting debating whether to bar partisan political activity from school property, then decided the question was too complicated to settle now. The board pushed any policy change to next spring, leaving the rules that govern campaign-season visits to campuses largely as they are heading into a contested election year.

The proposal came from board members Nadia Combs and Lynn Gray, who wanted a policy banning partisan activity on school board property and requiring the district to be notified by email before elected officials show up at a school. It followed a highly visible visit by U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to two Hillsborough schools on Aug. 26. Sen. Ashley Moody and Rep. Laurel Lee, both running for re-election, appeared alongside him, and Kennedy took questions from reporters about vaccines.

Gray said the timing made the visit feel loaded. "This is sensitive times," she said, adding that the optics "were not really that inviting." Combs said she wasn't trying to shut lawmakers out, since elected officials often help secure funding for the district, but wanted school visits to stay focused on district business rather than campaign talking points.

Why the board stopped short

The idea ran into a practical problem almost immediately: how do you write a rule that bans "partisan" speech without the district deciding, case by case, whose speech counts as partisan? Board attorney Jim Porter told members they had to be careful not to censor speech they simply disagreed with.

"A topic could be controversial, but just because the board doesn't think it's a good idea, you can't censor that," Porter said, according to the district's own meeting record. He said any definition of "partisan" would need to be built carefully into the policy to survive a First Amendment challenge.

Board member Patti Rendon raised a related point: people can disagree about whether something counts as partisan even when they're on the same side politically, which makes drawing a clean line harder than it sounds.

"You all have to be careful as a board not to prohibit speech that you don't like."

A vetting form instead of a ban

Board member Jessica Vaughn offered a narrower fix: require anyone requesting a school visit, including elected officials, to fill out a form describing why they want to come and what they hope to accomplish, and move press conferences off school property entirely.

"Our schools aren't a place to campaign or to host press conferences," Vaughn said.

Superintendent Van Ayres pushed back gently on the premise that visits are a problem. He told the board local officials have never simply shown up unannounced. "I have not seen one experience where they've just popped into school or just shown up," Ayres said, adding his staff would be fine filling out a form if the board wants one on record. He asked the board for clearer direction on what exactly it expects from him and his staff the next time an elected official asks to visit.

What happens next

No policy changes will take effect before the board revisits the issue next spring. That means the rules already on the books, which do not require advance notice or restrict what elected officials can say once inside a school, remain in place through the rest of this election cycle.

Combs said she hopes the pressure eases once November's elections are over. "Hopefully, in a few months things will die down (and) we just focus on educating our students and not politics," she said.

For now, parents with questions about a specific school visit can raise them with the school board directly; no public hearing date for a revised policy has been set.

Want to stay on top of stories like this one? Visit Tampa Community Website for local coverage, follow us on Facebook and Instagram, and join the conversation in our Community Forum. For more on this and other district issues, check out our education coverage.

Tampa Community WebsiteFREE COMMUNITY ACCESS

Continue this story for free.

Stay informed about Tampa. Enter your email to access the full story and receive local news and community updates.

Free to read · No password to remember

New here? We’ll email you a sign-in link and code. Already a reader? Use your usual email.

By continuing you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and, when creating a new subscription, request this community’s news and event emails, including sponsor messages. Unsubscribe anytime. Signing in again does not undo an earlier unsubscribe.

Add a comment
Share story

Comments

How does this affect your family or local school? Share your experience.

Your draft stays here while you sign in. Be respectful and keep it local.

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!

Keep exploring your community

Read next

Education

Florida's Top Education Official Cites Hillsborough in New Statewide Push to Pull Library Books

Commissioner Henry Mack wants every Florida district to hunt for "inappropriate" books before parents complain, and his memo points straight at Hillsborough County as the reason why.

Read the story ↗

Stay connected with Tampa

Follow us for the latest community news and updates